Thursday, July 16, 2020
Week 6 - Community
Thursday, July 9, 2020
Week 5 - Inviting, Safe, Inclusive, and Supportive for All
This week the reading in the AMLE text centered around the school environment and the factors that contribute to it being inviting, safe, inclusive, and supportive of all. There are a lot of great things within this text that lend themselves to activities I would like to incorporate into my classroom surrounding this topic. Family and community involvement are two of the big ones I would like to cultivate with my students. I have spoken before of my desire to have a student lead podcast where we can highlight the students, their achievements, and the current topics in the classroom. I thought this would be a great experience for the students to create in a medium that is easily digestible for the average parent during the morning commute. Ideally this could open up some discussions in the home about current business topics, student achievement, and maybe even student career aspirations that the parents would have been unaware of otherwise. It would also be amazing to get a diverse sampling of parents willing to come in and speak about their personal struggles and triumphs in business. Understanding that my perspective is that of a white male limited to particular areas of business I have already reached out to several colleagues about coming with me to present after I make the transition to teaching. I want my students to have a broad sampling of individuals and industries so they can see possibilities they may not have known existed or thought possible for themselves. This could also be incorporated with local businesses. Maybe we can partner with a marketing class to develop new marketing ideas for a local business. One class I observed had partnered with a local bakery to develop a unique cupcake that then became part of the menu. Allowing them to “try on” more roles can help them to explore areas they may not have considered, in a low risk environment. In a perfect world we could develop a network with former students willing to come back and contribute to some of these experiences and help mentor the next generation with the benefit of their own trials and tribulations.
Friday, July 3, 2020
Week 4 - Differentiated Instruction
In reading the articles this week I was struck by a topic that has caused me to struggle a bit, differentiated instruction. I believe the article alluded to part of why I have found it to be so difficult. When you have topics like accommodation, modification, and differentiation coming at you all at once I think it can be easy to look at teaching as individual instruction. The idea of individual instruction seems like an exhausting impossibility. “Food for thought on differentiated instruction” made it feel about as clear as it has ever been presented to me in the comparison to an old one room schoolhouse. Sometimes you address the whole group, sometimes a small group, and others an individual. Individualization is a sure path to burnout. Differentiation on the other hand furthers each student’s understanding as well as builds a sense of community within the group. These articles make me feel more confident in my understanding of the concept of differentiated instruction. The added depth of content, process, and product methods of differentiation was also interesting as it gave me a different perspective in how differentiation can happen. The associated links have definitely added a few new tools to my toolbox.
Friday, June 26, 2020
Week 3 - Principals and Leadership
The Wallace Foundation article this week dealt a great deal with leadership. In the educational setting the leader that we are typically talking about is the principal. They are the ones that come in and set the tone for the entire school. The article gave a great example of that in Dewey Hensley. He came into an “impossible situation” and turned around one of the worst schools in Kentucky. The characteristics and tactics he brought to the school really struck a chord with me because they rang true with much of the training I received and leadership I saw in the service. L. David Marquet, a former Captain on the USS Santa Fe, wrote a book called “Turn the Ship Around!” In it he tells a story, much like Dewey’s, about taking command of one of the lowest achieving ships in the fleet and turning it into one of the highest performing by empowering his crew and turning followers into leaders. That crew went on to receive a disproportionately high number of promotions to upper ranks and leadership positions throughout the fleet. My fellow business teachers out there may want to give this one a read, I have seen it listed on several “best” empowerment and leadership in business lists over the years. It also has a companion workbook I was looking into to see if it might have some exercises that can be translated to the classroom. Admittedly, I have a bias towards military sources of leadership because of my past experience, but I also believe that those methods and modalities are created with much slimmer margins of error. Take Jocko Willinik for example. He was a Navy SEAL and later a Navy SEAL instructor. In that time he learned and embodied a particular set of leadership characteristics that allowed him to handle strong personalities, foster unity, and empower leaders at every level because in that environment a failure to do so could lead to the loss of life. While the classroom is not that extreme, I believe that we have the same narrow margin for error if we want our students to be successful. Jocko has also written several books on leadership (some, I believe, are focused on younger children), founded a leadership contractor called Echelon Front, and hosts a leadership podcast(The Jocko Podcast). Luis and I had talked about using podcasts in the classroom and this one might be one to ponder. The episodes are around 20 minutes so they might be a little long but I do think they have content that can be used in clips or even to pull out some quotes to reflect on. One quote that comes from his partner Leif Babin, also a SEAL, is “it’s not what you preach, it’s what you tolerate.” I liken it to Dewey’s “tolerance for truth board.” On the truth board he posted the teacher’s faces with the progress of their students, displayed for every one to see. It ultimately lead to a high level of turnover in his first few years but I think it helped him find the right kind of teachers.
I know I went on a slight tangent beyond the importance of leadership in principals to some sources and applications for the classroom, but I am hoping that maybe some of these are new and can provide some further insight to you readers out there. I’d also like to touch on the teacher quote near the end of the article which said: “Principal’s have found talents in me that I didn’t know I had.” This reminded me of some words I heard from David Foster Wallace, and have adopted in a fashion as my definition of leadership: “Real leaders are people who help us overcome the limitations of our own individual laziness and selfishness and weakness and fear and get us to do better, harder things than we can get ourselves to do on our own.”
Friday, June 19, 2020
Week 2 – Essential Characteristics of Middle School
Those kinds of experiences are part of why I want to be a teacher. Specifically the concept of the “hidden curriculum” as presented by the AMLE text. In the Navy I had several students reach out to me after they had progressed in their careers to talk about their journey and ask for advice. I was very taken aback by some of the things they had to say and the interactions we had which stuck with them the most. One of my students was highly intelligent but always beat himself up about small mistakes and didn’t think he was “good enough.” As much as I had tried throughout the training cycle I couldn’t get him to see that worth within himself and understand how much potential he had. After graduation however we sat and had a discussion. It was less about the content and more about life, but that was what finally brought it all together for him. Now I don’t remember exactly what I had said and I was surprised that it meant so much to him. What he remembered though was that I had opened up to him on a personal level, and I shared my hopes, fears, and failures. We talked about what I had done and things I wish I had learned. That was when the way I had tried to teach him things finally clicked for him and he realized how much I cared. So when I read the text talking about small actions having a profound and lasting impact on a students education I think of him. He went on to advance incredibly quickly in the program and received many commendations along the way. I had a female student in the same class who was very quiet. I think our first meaningful interaction came when I was having a conversation with a coworker about I concert I had been to over the weekend. Now I think it is important to note that the program is not like traditional schooling and it is very possible to have a student in my class that I don’t have much interaction with. They have a computer based component, some traditional class work, oral and written exams, and small group events. Who the students interact with and learn from is largely up to them. They were allowed to form their own small groups and seek out the instructors they wanted to learn from. So that concert ended up being the thing that provided our initial interaction and we built trust from there. What stuck with me about that relationship was that she wrote herself a letter about how I treated everyone and gave it to her mother to hold onto and give back to her to read when she was older. In it she wrote about how I treated my peers and students. She admired my calm, fairness, and patience. But again as the text stated it was a small action outside of the planned curriculum that modeled a mindset and way to act for her, which in turn built our relationship and helped her feel more comfortable asking questions as well as being more receptive to the content.